Small 'Mother & Child' cubist, origami, Sculpture
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Small 'Mother & Child' cubist, origami, Sculpture
Hi. Recently found in the North West of England has anyone any ideas about this mother & Child sculpture. Measures 20 cms high x 17 cms in length x 12 cms wide and weighs 1.7 kgs. Marked on the back MM 92 2/10 (I think the 92 2/10 refers to year and date of make i.e. 2nd Oct 1992). If anyone could help identify who MM is it would be much appreciated. I suspect a local North West artist. Thanks
seandux- Number of posts : 125
Location : UK
Registration date : 2011-07-17
Re: Small 'Mother & Child' cubist, origami, Sculpture
What is it made out of? If it's stoneware I'll move it into ID My Pottery
_________________
Carrot cake is just fake cake
Re: Small 'Mother & Child' cubist, origami, Sculpture
It's really hard to tell as it has the same uniform grey covering all surface (including the base). Where the grey has been missed (in very very small areas) the underlying material looks white. It has a rough texture finish all over but the texture does not feel sharp but smooth. Very dense and heavy so I'm 99% sure it's solid. I've tried to scratch a little on the underside of the base but the material is really so dense it's very difficult to make any mark. Any suggestions?
seandux- Number of posts : 125
Location : UK
Registration date : 2011-07-17
Re: Small 'Mother & Child' cubist, origami, Sculpture
It might be reconstituted stone - resin mixed with powdered rock.
_________________
Carrot cake is just fake cake
Re: Small 'Mother & Child' cubist, origami, Sculpture
It will be 2 from an edition of 10.
I've looked through my Dictionary of Artists in Britain since 1945 and can't find a sculptor with those initials that fits.
The style is harking back for 1992 and therefore derivative so it is unlikely to be someone with a significant reputation. Having said that, it is something that I would have bought if I'd seen it and I didn't think it was expensive.
I've looked through my Dictionary of Artists in Britain since 1945 and can't find a sculptor with those initials that fits.
The style is harking back for 1992 and therefore derivative so it is unlikely to be someone with a significant reputation. Having said that, it is something that I would have bought if I'd seen it and I didn't think it was expensive.
_________________
Now you should know by now that Potty and I need to see your bottom - we're funny that way!
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum