Leach St Ives Pottery L mark dots - Jeffrey Larkin

I bought this piece at auction yesterday , its definitely Leach pottery but having been through all the potters who have ever worked there I can't find one that used a single "L" for their mark . It looks the same as the L in Bernards "BL" mark with the two dots so that makes me think it was one of the Leaches but which one? any ideas?

They did very little salt glazing at the Leach Pottery in Bernard's time in charge. Would it be possible to see the base please?

Good evening,
I have been trying to identify the mark on two pots as photographs.
Both pots have clear marks for

the leach pottery but after many calls / emails I am still none the wiser.
Any suggestions will be followed up and I will report back.
I apologise if you have already seen this post on other sites.

This is the second pot which you may have already seen again same marks L: with the Leach pottery mark.

One out of left field suggestion. John Leach, the eldest of David Leach's sons. The L with the two dots looks somewhat like the Lowerdown mark used by David Leach. John Leach actually worked at the Leach St Ives pottery 1960-63 before setting up the famed Mulcheney pottery. So in fact he was an apprentice there. Which would give substance to the slightly studenty nature of the pieces.
           Pure conjecture of course.

They look a lot more recent than 60's in my opinion, going by the style and glaze. But I know very little about Leach pottery, hopefully SP will take a look.

That small Leach mark is one that tended to be used on the earlier work. I don't think that the Leach pottery mark shown here is one they have used in its modern incarnation.

I wasn’t sure whether this further information would assist or not but given that there is no current definitive answer I may as well add it. I have conversed with Mike Sanderson, Joanna Wason, John Bedding and Jeff Oestreich who between them said it wasn’t Janet Leach but the clay was similar to some that Janet gave to Jeff in the seventies. John Bedding said that he had seen the mark before but didn’t know who it was by.
One suggestion was that it could be Jeff Larkin who is in America would make sense that he couldn’t use JL but he hasn’t responded to my e mails. I took the pots to the current Leach potters as well but they couldn’t add to it. I also took it to David Kirk (auctioneer in Penzance) and a knowledgeable antique dealer in Marazion - no joy.
I will contact Jeremy Leach to see if he can assist.
The fact that John Bedding recognised the mark and that I know there are other pots out there which have the same mark is strange. Neither pot is standard ware and I take the point of the small Leach mark. I knew how many potters / apprentices there were at the Leach but I didn’t think it would be as difficult as it is proving to be. From my perspective, because the people I have asked can’t assist, I believe they are probably from the 50-60’s. Tenuous thought process though which wouldn’t stand scrutiny! One suggestion was that it was early JL and that she ceased to use it because it was so close to BL: unfortunately I feel the available enquiries left are becoming exhausted and we may never know!

Is a definitive list of ALL the potters who worked at Leach St Ives actually known with complete and utter certainty?

The previous posts were interesting particularly from 2014!

This was from Jeff Oestreich to add


I feel these were made around the time I was working at the Leach (1969-1971. Up until this time they were not salt glazing. In the corner of the kiln room behind the climbing kiln there was the start of a salt kiln. The person that built it hadn’t finished it. Janet said if I finished it it could be my kiln. I was in love with salt at that time. I finished it, put a chimney up through the roof and fired it twice with not good results. I abandoned it. But the clay in your pots looks like the clay I mixed up that Janet gave me. For a second I thought the pitcher was one I made but no. It is very much like the standard ware pitchers we were making. They stopped making standwardware when Bernard died in 1979. My guess it was made between my time and 1979 by an apprentice there who wasn’t recorded in the Marion Whybrow The Leach Legacy book

Hi Naomi,
Thanks for your input which is always helpful
I actually went to Mikes house and showed him the jug.
He was really helpful and made some suggestions which I followed up the Leach potters tree is on his website mikes pots which is exceptionally good!

philpot wrote:Is a definitive list of ALL the potters who worked at Leach St Ives actually known with complete and utter certainty?

I am not aware of one.

Neil62 wrote:I wasn’t sure whether this further information would assist or not but given that there is no current definitive answer I may as well add it. I have conversed with Mike Sanderson, Joanna Wason, John Bedding and Jeff Oestreich who between them said it wasn’t Janet Leach but the clay was similar to some that Janet gave to Jeff in the seventies. John Bedding said that he had seen the mark before but didn’t know who it was by.
One suggestion was that it could be Jeff Larkin who is in America would make sense that he couldn’t use JL but he hasn’t responded to my e mails. I took the pots to the current Leach potters as well but they couldn’t add to it. I also took it to David Kirk (auctioneer in Penzance) and a knowledgeable antique dealer in Marazion - no joy.
I will contact Jeremy Leach to see if he can assist.
The fact that John Bedding recognised the mark and that I know there are other pots out there which have the same mark is strange. Neither pot is standard ware and I take the point of the small Leach mark. I knew how many potters / apprentices there were at the Leach but I didn’t think it would be as difficult as it is proving to be. From my perspective, because the people I have asked can’t assist, I believe they are probably from the 50-60’s. Tenuous thought process though which wouldn’t stand scrutiny! One suggestion was that it was early JL and that she ceased to use it because it was so close to BL: unfortunately I feel the available enquiries left are becoming  exhausted and we may never know!

They're not by Janet Leach and from what has been said I think Jeff Larkin appears to be the strongest possibility. Have you tried getting in touch with him and his brother via the contact page of the Featherstone Pottery website?

I have had Leach pots in the past that I haven't been able to identify, as there is no definitive list of marks that individual potters used while working there.

P.S. Jeremy won't know anything.

Yes I have e mailed Jeff on their website twice 2 weeks apart.
The automated response I got was that they would respond within 48 hours, but other than that nothing. Whilst I respect your opinion that Jeremy won’t know anything and you are probably correct it is an enquiry once done I can then eliminate it. It is a pity, and I don’t know if it was done or not, but when this mark first came to light in 2014 it is a pity that someone didn’t speak to Trevor Corser although he sadly passed the following year he was still working.

For what my opinions worth Naomi that is pretty much as I thought!
It was partially bolstered by what Jeff Oestreich said about the clay he had been given by Janet being similar in nature but then Joanna sort of scuppered that thought.
I don’t know enough about Janet’s work to comment I have a few pieces by her but I can’t identify the dates they were produced so that’s not much use.
Fascinating and annoying at the same time, it’s a pity I can’t get a response from Jeff Larkin as he could have been of assistance.
Thanks for your time Naomi

I think that the early days of Janet Leach at the Leach pottery may will have somewhat turbulent. With David Leach leaving in the shadow of a family rumpus. and Michael leaving in 1955. It must have been a helluva job both being Both Bernard's younger new wife, and have an essential part in reorganising the pottery. In the two books about Janet Leach, those years were not covered in detail. BUT if this mark was an early one by Janet Leach, surely she would have kept some pieces as evidence of her first start at the pottery? To most of us in that position they would be an important reminder of that Time.

Neil62 wrote:For what my opinions worth Naomi that is pretty much as I thought!
It was partially bolstered by what Jeff Oestreich said about the clay he had been given by Janet being similar in nature but then Joanna sort of scuppered that thought.
I don’t know enough about Janet’s work to comment I have a few pieces by her but I can’t identify the dates they were produced so that’s not much use.
Fascinating and annoying at the same time, it’s a pity I can’t get a response from Jeff Larkin as he could have been of assistance.
Thanks for your time Naomi

The bottom line is that Jeff Oestreich was there at the time that these pieces are likely to have been made from all of the other evidence. Joanna Wason would have no more idea about that than you or I, as she was not there when these L: pieces were made, as Naomi says.

The real importance is that they are salt-glazed, which ties them down to a certain period in the 1970s.

Finally, regarding the St Ives seal that Janet used. She always made her pots away from others at the pottery and so would have her own St Ives seal. Therefore comparing her St Ives seal with that used by others to try and date a pot is a non-starter.