Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
+6
denbydump
cycladelic
philpot
skipposal
Davee
big ed
10 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Last edited by big ed on August 29th 2011, 6:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
big ed- Number of posts : 11932
Age : 71
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-03-22
big ed- Number of posts : 11932
Age : 71
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-03-22
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Its a salt pig Ed, and they still make them if you check the website.
_________________
skay wrote: Let's do some bumping please.
Davee- Consultant
- Number of posts : 2211
Age : 54
Location : West Mids UK
Registration date : 2009-07-26
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Love Muchelney pottery - that toasted clay effect is so attractive. Here are a couple in my collection:
Byron Temple
Just seen a couple of possible Byron Temple pots in the ID thread so thought I'd post this Muchelney beaker I got in an auction lot recently. It was one of a pair the other sold to an American buyer. I tentatively identified the other mark as by Byron Temple given that BSPM says he worked at Muchelney as well as Leach St Ives in the 1958-61 period. However, other sources including a research essay by Rob Barnard I found online disagreed. Anyone have any idea?
Wheelthrown fine white stoneware faceted beaker. Toasted unglazed exterior, greenish speckled glaze inside. 10.2cm (height)
Rob Barnard essay Byron Temple - A Romantic Pragmatist
Wheelthrown fine white stoneware faceted beaker. Toasted unglazed exterior, greenish speckled glaze inside. 10.2cm (height)
Rob Barnard essay Byron Temple - A Romantic Pragmatist
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
I have a Byron Temple vase which looks very much like a Mulcheney one.Plus I previously owned another Byron Temple vase-and have seen one other in auction- which had John Leach's atypical 'Black smoke' dry glaze.Without the Byron Temple mark,you would have assumed it was a John Leach.
So,yes definitely,he did work at Mulcheney.
So,yes definitely,he did work at Mulcheney.
philpot- Number of posts : 6712
Location : cambridge
Registration date : 2010-11-06
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
SP has kindly confirmed the ID via John Leach himself. Byron didn't work there but did visit and make a few pots. Means this one is very rare. I've let the American buyer of the other one know.
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Bottle 7.5" High Marked M 1967 And incised Muchelney
big ed- Number of posts : 11932
Age : 71
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-03-22
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Why were these marked with dates ?I saw a 1968 one as well on the studio pottery site
big ed- Number of posts : 11932
Age : 71
Location : UK
Registration date : 2008-03-22
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Muchelney Pottery Jug
_________________
Carrot cake is just fake cake
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
A humble Muchelney eggcup...
cycladelic- Number of posts : 577
Location : Island in the China Sea
Registration date : 2012-11-02
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
A 5" dia pot and lid with a green glazed interior...
cycladelic- Number of posts : 577
Location : Island in the China Sea
Registration date : 2012-11-02
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Early Muchelney Pottery teapot or coffee pot
(Happy to say this has gone back to John Leach at Muchelney).
(Happy to say this has gone back to John Leach at Muchelney).
_________________
Carrot cake is just fake cake
hadfield- Number of posts : 106
Location : UK
Registration date : 2020-06-19
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Suppose by the lack of replies this is stumping the experts. I tried all the avenues to track it down but as of yet no ideas
hadfield- Number of posts : 106
Location : UK
Registration date : 2020-06-19
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
It isn't the usual way that people working there were allowed to mark their individual work. Therefore, it might be a code for the stoneware body mix that was being used and marked to see how it fired compared with the usual stoneware body.
_________________
Now you should know by now that Potty and I need to see your bottom - we're funny that way!
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
The problem is, its probably unlikely that we could provide you with much more information than you already have. Mulcheney standard ware was always very uniform, and this would have been a personal piece, and would normally have a personal mark. Probably by John Leach himself, as he was the one who who made the bigger personal pieces. I have had a similar looking one myself in the past.
But after that? Why it has no personal mark? The initials might possibly refer to a glaze code or a new style indication, but that would be speculation.
Where did you get it from? What size is it? Further details might possibly help.
But after that? Why it has no personal mark? The initials might possibly refer to a glaze code or a new style indication, but that would be speculation.
Where did you get it from? What size is it? Further details might possibly help.
philpot- Number of posts : 6712
Location : cambridge
Registration date : 2010-11-06
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
I’ve not seen a mark like that before so I think glaze code is most likely
_________________
Carrot cake is just fake cake
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Thank you all for the info. pleased to learn about glaze marks and possibly stoneware mixes.
hadfield- Number of posts : 106
Location : UK
Registration date : 2020-06-19
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
hadfield wrote:Thank you all for the info. pleased to learn about glaze marks and possibly stoneware mixes.
Usually clay body recipe mixes are denoted by an incised code and glaze codes are written on after glazes are applied i.e. not incised.
_________________
Now you should know by now that Potty and I need to see your bottom - we're funny that way!
benwilliams- Number of posts : 2490
Location : Devon
Registration date : 2017-12-27
Re: Muchelney Pottery (standard ware)
Nick Rees, Mark Melbourne, John Leach, Jeremy Leach, and Ben Leach have all potted at Muchelney but without a mark it’s impossible to say which individual made it. I guess it was a commission and maybe a set were made and they all had a hand in them
_________________
Carrot cake is just fake cake
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum